The XLR is meant to be a competitive threat against the well established European and Japanese luxury cars. This two-seater is Cadillac’s pride-and-joy. Don’t be confused – even though the XLR has the same platform as the Corvette, the XLR isn’t a Corvette in disguise. This caddy is more of a country cruising machine than a sports hot rod. This is a bit of an old-man caddy, with a softer and more agreeable ride. It also uses a more subdued 4/6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 engine rather than the Vette’s edgier 6/2-liter, 436-hp V8 power plant.

Since the XLR uses aircraft-light parts, it isn’t heavy and logy like some might suspect. In addition, the standard Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension system automatically firms up or softens the suspension based on driving conditions. Adding this up provide smooth and responsive maneuvers. The mash-up of the cutting exterior and bold interior with catching accents do make for a compelling presence. The XLR’s retractable hard top provides a great trade off between hard top and open top. Whenever you put the top down, you should already have in place a Cadillac windscreen.

This Cadillac XLR does indeed turn heads, but it’s not worthy all of the hype GM is giving it – far from it. . The Corvette looks pretty good against the XLR in comparison, which is $20K less expensive and provides more power.

As fast as the XLR is when pushed, those expecting a true Cadillac sports car will be disappointed. The take-off from the line is quick, but not as quick as the Corvette. The XLR isn’t notable on the chassis, which rolls to heavily into curves and pitches to far down when breaking fast. Even though this car is fitted with adaptive suspension with split-second control, the XLR is still not up to the handling performance of its European and Japanese rivals. The XLR is best on the open highway, when it can really stretch its legs and unwind. If putting the top down, then don’t go without a Cadillac windscreen.

——————————-
When the author isn’t driving her XLR around town, she’s a fan of psychic reviews, the Seattle HCG Diet Center, and the Cadillac XLR windscreen windblocker wind deflector.

This is an entry from Cadillac, going up against mature European and Japanese luxury models. The XLR is a flashy car, what Cadillac wants to build up. Though it shares the same platform as the current Corvette, the XLR variant is not a simple case of corporate badge engineering. This caddy has more in common with the luxury boat cruisers than sporty little roadsters. The Caddy’s responses are softer and comfortably refined. The XLR places a mellower 4/6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 engine rather than the Vette’s edgier 6/2-liter, 436-hp V8 power plant.

The XLR makes use of light weight parts pretty aggressively, so this car is lighter on its feet then some might suspect. In addition, the standard Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension system automatically firms up or softens the suspension based on driving conditions. This ensures generally smooth and responsive maneuvers. When you put together the edgy, angular styling outside the body and the wood accent inside the interior, you do get a rich looking car. Further, the XLR’s power retractable hardtop roof allows the comfort and security of a coupe when the top is raised. Whenever you pull back the hard top, then you should have a Cadillac windscreen.

The Cadillac XLR does indeed make a stunner, but it’s not worthy of it’s self named, world class status. . If you’re looking at the XLR, then you might as well be looking at the Corvette, which costs $20K less and provides 116 more horse power.

The XLR is certainly a fast car, but, well, it’s just not sports car fast. Acceleration, though certainly quick, is not as forceful as its corporate cousin. The XLR has squishy suspension which causes the vehicle to pitch and roll under heavy cornering. Even though this car is fitted with adaptive suspension with split-second control, the XLR is still not up to the handling performance of its European and Japanese rivals. The XLR does its best driving on the highway, when you’re in the straight line. If going with the top down, then your wife will thank you for getting a Cadillac windscreen.

——————————-
When the author isn’t driving her XLR around town, she’s a fan of psychic reviews, the Seattle HCG Diet Center, and the Cadillac XLR windscreen windblocker wind deflector.

The XLR is meant to be a competitive threat against the well established European and Japanese luxury cars. The two-seat Cadillac XLR roadster is the company’s flagship vehicle. Though the XLR has the same platform as the Corvette, well, actually,the Corvette makes better us of it. This caddy is more like a land yacht than a nimble little sports car. This Caddy is a bit of a candy-ass with a softer and more comfortable ride. The XLR puts under the hood a softer 4/6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 engine rather than the Vette’s edgier 6/2-liter, 436-hp V8 power generator.

Since the XLR uses aircraft-light parts, it isn’t heavy and logy like some might suspect. Also, the standard Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension system thinks for you, adjusting ride smoothness automatically. With all of this taken together, you get smooth and responsive maneuvers. The mash-up of the cutting exterior and bold interior with catching accents do make for a compelling presence. Further, the XLR’s power retractable hardtop roof allows the comfort and security of a coupe when the top is raised. Whenever you pull back the hard top, then you should have a Cadillac windscreen.

As impressive as it is, the Cadillac XLR roadster is not quite the “standard of the world” — far from it. . The Corvette looks pretty good against the XLR in comparison, which is $20K less expensive and provides more power.

The XLR certainly have plenty of speed, but the top-end may still come out short for some enthusiasts. The acceleration is good, but it doesn’t feel like you’re blasting off from a rocket, like it should. The XLR isn’t notable on the chassis, which rolls to heavily into curves and pitches to far down when breaking fast. Even though this car is fitted with adaptive suspension with split-second control, the XLR is still not up to the handling performance of its European and Japanese rivals. The XLR is best on the open highway, when it can really stretch its legs and unwind. If putting the top down, then don’t go without a Cadillac windscreen.

——————————-
When the author isn’t driving her XLR around town, she’s a fan of psychic reviews, the Seattle HCG Diet Center, and the Cadillac XLR windscreen windblocker wind deflector.

This is an entry from Cadillac, going up against mature European and Japanese luxury models. This two-seater is Cadillac’s pride-and-joy. Though it shares the same platform as the current Corvette, the XLR variant is not a simple case of corporate badge engineering. It’s more of a grand touring machine than a hard-edged sports car. This is a bit of an old-man caddy, with a softer and more agreeable ride. The XLR puts under the hood a softer 4/6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 engine rather than the Vette’s edgier 6/2-liter, 436-hp V8 power generator.

The XLR makes use of light weight parts pretty aggressively, so this car is lighter on its feet then some might suspect. In addition, the standard Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension system automatically firms up or softens the suspension based on driving conditions. With all of this taken together, you get smooth and responsive maneuvers. The joining of forces between the space-age rocket designed exterior and carbon interior make this a go-go car. The retractable hard top is a great piece of engineering, a great switch between hard top and the soft top. If going top down, then you really should get a Cadillac windscreen.

This Cadillac XLR does indeed turn heads, but it’s not worthy all of the hype GM is giving it – far from it. Though its styling and Cadillac badge will appeal to those looking to roll up to the valet in something different from the status quo, the XLR comes up short in terms of maximum performance.  The interior is especially disappointing when compared to its similarly priced rivals from Germany and Great Britain. The Corvette is a better car, which is $20K less in the price tag, and the engine delivers more ponies.

Even though the XLR is pretty zippy, this still isn’t a true sport car – you better look elsewhere. Acceleration, though certainly quick, is not as forceful as its corporate cousin. The XLR isn’t notable on the chassis, which rolls to heavily into curves and pitches to far down when breaking fast. Even with its adaptive suspension’s split-second response, the Cadillac XLR still feels less willing to tackle turns than the more athletic European contenders. The XLR is best on the open highway, when it can really stretch its legs and unwind. If going with the top down, then your wife will thank you for getting a Cadillac windscreen.

——————————-
When the author isn’t driving her XLR around town, she’s a fan of psychic reviews, the Seattle HCG Diet Center, and the Cadillac XLR windscreen windblocker wind deflector.

This is an entry from Cadillac, going up against mature European and Japanese luxury models. This two-seater is Cadillac’s pride-and-joy. Though it shares the same platform as the current Corvette, the XLR variant is not a simple case of corporate badge engineering. This caddy is more like a land yacht than a nimble little sports car. This Caddy is a bit of a candy-ass with a softer and more comfortable ride. It also uses a more subdued 4/6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 engine rather than the Vette’s edgier 6/2-liter, 436-hp V8 power plant.

Since the XLR uses aircraft-light parts, it isn’t heavy and logy like some might suspect. In addition, the standard Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension system automatically firms up or softens the suspension based on driving conditions. All of this makes for smooth and responsive maneuvers. The mash-up of the cutting exterior and bold interior with catching accents do make for a compelling presence. The XLR’s retractable hard top provides a great trade off between hard top and open top. Whenever you put the top down, you should already have in place a Cadillac windscreen.

This Cadillac XLR does indeed turn heads, but it’s not worthy all of the hype GM is giving it – far from it. . The Corvette looks pretty good against the XLR in comparison, which is $20K less expensive and provides more power.

The XLR certainly have plenty of speed, but the top-end may still come out short for some enthusiasts. The acceleration is good, but it doesn’t feel like you’re blasting off from a rocket, like it should. The XLR isn’t notable on the chassis, which rolls to heavily into curves and pitches to far down when breaking fast. Even with its adaptive suspension’s split-second response, the Cadillac XLR still feels less willing to tackle turns than the more athletic European contenders. The XLR does its best driving on the highway, when you’re in the straight line. Remember, if you go top down, then you should also go with a Cadillac windscreen.

——————————-
When the author isn’t driving her XLR around town, she’s a fan of psychic reviews, the Seattle HCG Diet Center, and the Cadillac XLR windscreen windblocker wind deflector.

The XLR is meant to be a competitive threat against the well established European and Japanese luxury cars. The sporty XLR is what Cadillac wants people to think of, when envisioning this namebadge. Though the XLR has the same platform as the Corvette, well, actually,the Corvette makes better us of it. It’s more of a grand touring machine than a hard-edged sports car. The Caddy’s responses are softer and comfortably refined. The XLR also uses a tamer 4/6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 engine rather than the Vette’s edgier 6/2-liter, 436-hp V8 engine.

The XLR makes good use of lightweight parts, such as aluminum suspension pieces, that keeps the XLR’s weight pretty reasonable. The super-duper Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension system does a great job of automatically adjusting the suspension for ride smoothness. All of this makes for smooth and responsive maneuvers. The mash-up of the cutting exterior and bold interior with catching accents do make for a compelling presence. Further, the XLR’s power retractable hardtop roof allows the comfort and security of a coupe when the top is raised. Whenever you put the top down, you should already have in place a Cadillac windscreen.

The Cadillac XLR is a good-to-great car, but it’s not the “standard of the world” as GM likes to proclaim it as. Though its styling and Cadillac badge will appeal to those looking to roll up to the valet in something different from the status quo, the XLR comes up short in terms of maximum performance.  The interior is especially disappointing when compared to its similarly priced rivals from Germany and Great Britain. The Corvette is a better car, which is $20K less in the price tag, and the engine delivers more ponies.

The XLR certainly have plenty of speed, but the top-end may still come out short for some enthusiasts. The take-off from the line is quick, but not as quick as the Corvette. The XLR isn’t notable on the chassis, which rolls to heavily into curves and pitches to far down when breaking fast. Even with its adaptive suspension’s split-second response, the Cadillac XLR still feels less willing to tackle turns than the more athletic European contenders. The XLR does its best performance on the highway, where the car can practically drive itself. Remember, if you go top down, then you should also go with a Cadillac windscreen.

——————————-
When the author isn’t driving her XLR around town, she’s a fan of psychic reviews, the Seattle HCG Diet Center, and the Cadillac XLR windscreen windblocker wind deflector.

The original Sebring was launched in 1995 as Chrysler’s new midsize coupe. Mechanically, it was related to the Mitsubishi Galant of the same period. Along with the LX and LXi coupes, they were propelled with a 163-hp, 2/5 liter engine, mated to a four speed automatic transmission. At the time, the vehicle’s best attributes were its sporty and purposeful exterior styling and roomy (for a coupe) interior. The steeply lined windshield didn’t compromise headroom, and there was also plenty of space in the trunk. Going top down, then you’d better obtain a windscreen.

A new Chrysler Sebring model was introduced in 2001, of newly innovated couples and convertible models, powered by new engine designs. Just like the previous generation, the platform was shared with Mitsubishi. The top-shelf option was a 3/0-liter V6 turning out a whopping 200-hp. The LXi Couple was the Sebring’s initial offering. Standard in convertibles and LXi Sedans was the Chrysler-built 2/7-liter V6 rated at 200 hp. The Sebring also offered a 2/4 liter engine. The pros reviewing the Sebring noted the car’s visual appeal, reliability, attractive pricing, and available options.

The Sebring was prolific with offering different trim levels: the LX, LXi, GTC, TSi, and Touring trim models. The regular Sebring stopped in 2005; the convertible in 2006. Going top-down still meant all of the turbulence in the Sebring, unless you got a windscreen.

With the march of time, the 2nd generation Sebring became more-and-more dated. The Sebring was about as pleasant as a school bus to ride in with its unforgiving chassis. Used car shopper wouldn’t do bad with the Sebring, although better options exist  Despite the Sebring’s drawbacks, one will still be pleased with this car.  The Sebring will always have a fond place in car driver’s hearts.

———————————–
When the author isn’t driving around her Sebring, she’s a fan of the Chrysler Sebring windscreen windblocker w ind deflector, the psychic reviews, and the Seattle HCG Diet and Weight Loss.

These initials come from Sporty, Light, and Short (or Kurz in German). The SLK R170 was a smaller and lighter version of Mercedes SL sports car. The SLK 170 was first introduced in 1996 to much fanfare. The initial sales started with a very respectable 50,000 units. However, time and competition aged this car. It was going head-to-head unfavorably against the Audi II. Furthermore, time was dating its technology.

The SLK’s hard top is its best feature; the underpowered and sluggish engine, its worst. The steering was taken from the C-class, the recirculating ball, which yielded a sluggish response.

When compared to rivals, the TT Roadster, the BMW Z3, and the Alfa Romero Spider, the Mercedes SLK 170 still stands out with its sex appeal. While the engine was uninspiring, they say North American drivers wanted the better gas millage over the power.

The distinctive feature for this Mercedes was its retractable hardtop. Although going with the top-down, you should still be equipped with a windscreen. This automated, retractible hard top follows the likeness of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT Spyder, Peugeot 206cc, Lexus SC, Mercedes SL Class, and the Chrysler Sebring.

Being well aware of how the SLK was coming up short, the 2/3 liter Kompressor came out in 2000. This newer SLK took on some extra power under the hood, refined body styling, and lost some of its body weight. The engine is smooth and doesn’t gag when at low revs. Mercedes did make upgrades with the transmission, making shifting smooth as silk. There was a new close-ratio six-speed manual, borrowed from the E-class of Mercedes. If you wanted an automatic, then you were stuck with only five gears. Going with the top down still invites all of the backlash, needing a windscreen. Also, the chassis was improved for a smoother ride and safety improvements.

These changes are small and minor over time. The Mercedes SLK R170 is still an impressive car that puts a lump in the throat.

———————————
When the author isn’t driving her SLK around, she’s a fan of the Mercedes Benz SLK windscreen windblocker wind deflector, the psychic readings, and theSeattle HCG Diet.

The original Sebring entered into the automotive universe in 1995, for midsize coupes. Underneath, the Sebring was related to the Mitsubishi Galant. Available in LX or LXi trim, the Sebring coupe came with a 163-hp, 2/5-liter V6 and a standard four-speed automatic. When reviewers got ahold of the car, they quickly praised it for its looks and ample interior. The steeply lined windshield didn’t compromise headroom, and there was also plenty of space in the trunk. Going top down, then you’d better obtain a windscreen.

Chrysler demonstrated to the world back in 2001 a new Sebring sedan, with updated engines and transmissions underneath. Just like the previous generation, the platform was shared with Mitsubishi. At the top of the heap was a 3/0-liter V6 cranking out 200 hp. The LXi Couple was the Sebring’s initial offering. Standard in convertibles and LXi Sedans was the Chrysler-built 2/7-liter V6 rated at 200 hp. A smaller, four banger 2/4 liter engine was also available. The Sebring was given high marks for its external looks, engine reliability, and consumer options.

The Sebring was prolific with offering different trim levels: the LX, LXi, GTC, TSi, and Touring trim models. By 2006, the Sebring was being produced no more. Going top-down still meant all of the turbulence in the Sebring, unless you got a windscreen.

This second evolution of the Sebring was good at the start, but competitors soon introduced more compelling models. In later tests, its drive trains were unrefined; its ride quality was harsh (particularly in the sedan); and its build and interior materials quality were well below average. If you’re looking for a used Sebring, then you’ll have the best luck with the late 90’s and early 2000s  Despite the Sebring’s drawbacks, one will still be pleased with this car.  The Sebring will always have a fond place in car driver’s hearts.

———————————–
When the author isn’t driving around her Sebring, she’s a fan of the Chrysler Sebring windscreen windblocker w ind deflector, the psychic reviews, and the Seattle HCG Diet and Weight Loss.

The marketing brains at Mercedes originated this acryonym from Sporty, Light, and Short (or Kurz in German). The SLK R170 was Mercedes first take at shrinking the popular SL sports car. The SLK R170 appeared first in 1996 to legions of fans. Sales out of the gate started at 50,000 units. Though, time and other competitors moving forward aged the SLK. The Audi TT, its closest competitor, was starting the gain the edge. Then, it was looking stale when compared to the rest of the pack.

The SLK gets the most praise for the hard top design, while the engine garners the most giggles and snickers. The steering mechanism came for the C-class chassis, the recirculating ball steering, which was sloppy.

Comparing to rivals, the TT Roadster, the BMW Z3, and the Alfa Romero Spider, the Mercedes SLK still visually stands out. While the engine could be weak, drivers in North America value relaxed driving over power.

The distinctive feature for this Mercedes was its retractable hardtop. Going top-down is still impracticable unless you have a windscreen. This automated, retractible hard top follows the likeness of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT Spyder, Peugeot 206cc, Lexus SC, Mercedes SL Class, and the Chrysler Sebring.

To address the shortcomings, the 2/3 liter Kompressor came out in 2000. This car gained extra power, different styling on the body, and improved handling. The engine now has a better idle. Mercedes also improved the transmission, making it smooth shifting. There was new six-speed transmission, pieced together from the E-class. Those wanting the automatic were given five speeds. Putting the top down makes you drown in wind, unless you have a need a windscreen. Furthermore, the chassis got a long needed upgrade with a smoother ride and safety enhancement.

These changes are subtle, adding up to nothing revolutionary. The Mercedes SLK R170 still draws the raves.

———————————
When the author isn’t driving her SLK around, she’s a fan of the Mercedes Benz SLK windscreen windblocker wind deflector, the psychic readings, and theSeattle HCG Diet.

Newer Posts »